歡迎來(lái)到煙臺(tái)論壇,! 請(qǐng)登錄/注冊(cè) 一鍵登錄:

AV无码一区二区二三区1区6区_成人无码视频97免费_丰满的熟妇岳中文字幕_国产精品精品自在线拍_国产精品久久久天天影视香蕉_国产精品线在线精品_国产精品亚洲AV人片_国产午夜精品一区二区三区漫画_国产午夜无码视频在线观看_国产亚洲精品第一综合另类灬,无码国产亚洲日韩国精品,欧美精品九九99久,被粗大J8捣出白浆公交车视频

查看: 3250|回復(fù): 0
打印 上一主題 下一主題
收起左側(cè)

[其他] 雙語(yǔ)囧研究:快速閱讀培訓(xùn)都是騙人的

[復(fù)制鏈接]
跳轉(zhuǎn)到指定樓層
樓主
發(fā)表于 2016-1-28 13:16 | 只看該作者 回帖獎(jiǎng)勵(lì) |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式 | 來(lái)自山東

馬上注冊(cè),,結(jié)交更多好友,享用更多功能,讓你輕松玩轉(zhuǎn)社區(qū),。

您需要 登錄 才可以下載或查看,,沒(méi)有帳號(hào)?點(diǎn)這里注冊(cè)

x
  I'll be the first to admit it: My life would be a whole lot easier if I could speed-read. Instead of spending an hour poring over a dense scientific paper, I'd spend just a few minutes and understand everything perfectly.Unfortunately, while there are plenty of ads claiming they could teach me to do just that, a new study suggests those claims are basically bogus. For the study, published in Psychological Science.
  我是第一個(gè)承認(rèn)這個(gè)事實(shí)的人:如果我能快速閱讀,,那么我的生活會(huì)更加簡(jiǎn)單,。我可以用幾分鐘就完全理解所有事情,根本不用花一個(gè)小時(shí)去研究那厚厚的論文,。不幸的是,,雖然很多廣告都宣稱自己可以教我如何快速閱讀,,但是一項(xiàng)最新研究表明,,這些承諾都是假的。這份研究發(fā)表在了《心理科學(xué)》上,。

  For example, one argument is that speed-reading training helps you absorb more information in a single glance than you typically do. But the researchers say that "what limits our ability to process text is our capacity to recognise words and understand text" - and not how many words our eyes take in at a time.
  例如,,其中一個(gè)爭(zhēng)議就是,快速閱讀訓(xùn)練可以讓你一目十行,,這比你按部就班地閱讀獲得的信息更多,。但研究人員說(shuō),限制我們閱讀能力的是我們理解句子和文章的能力,,而不是我們一次能夠看多少句子,。

  In 1980, in a most comprehensive review of speed-reading, scientists compared comprehension among a group of speed readers, normal readers, and people told to skim the text.Results showed that the speed readers understood the text better than the skimmers, but not as well as those reading at normal speed. If the speed readers hadn't looked directly at a specific passage, they weren't able to answer detailed questions about that part.
  1980年,研究人員對(duì)快速閱讀進(jìn)行了一次最為詳細(xì)的研究,,科學(xué)家們對(duì)比了幾組讀者的理解力,,分別是:快速閱讀者、正常閱讀者和被告知要略讀文章的讀者,。結(jié)果顯示,,快速閱讀者比略讀者更好地理解文章,但卻不如正常速度的閱讀者,。如果快速閱讀者沒(méi)有直接去看有答案的段落,,那他們就無(wú)法回答關(guān)于那個(gè)段落的詳細(xì)問(wèn)題。

  And while they acknowledge that skimming can be useful when you're overloaded with information, they say skimmers necessarily make a "trade-off between speed and accuracy".
  但研究人員承認(rèn),,當(dāng)你無(wú)法承載過(guò)多信息時(shí),,略讀會(huì)十分有效,他們稱必要的略讀是在尋找“速度與準(zhǔn)確性之間的平衡”,。

  So if you reached this point in the article within 10 seconds (busted!), there's little chance you absorbed it all. If you intended to skim, that's fine, but if you thought you were paying close attention, you should probably read it again.
  所以,,如果你10秒內(nèi)看到了這里,那么你很可能沒(méi)有完全理解文章哦,。如果你故意略讀,,那也行,但如果你覺(jué)得自己注意力集中,那你最好還是再讀一遍,�,!�(滬江英語(yǔ))

本版積分規(guī)則

社區(qū)地圖 | 刪帖幫助 | 手機(jī)版

煙臺(tái)論壇-煙臺(tái)社區(qū) 魯ICP備05034347號(hào) 魯公網(wǎng)安備 37060202000105號(hào)

免責(zé)聲明:本網(wǎng)頁(yè)提供的文字圖片及視頻等信息都由網(wǎng)友產(chǎn)生,本網(wǎng)站僅提供存儲(chǔ)服務(wù),,如有侵犯您的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán),,請(qǐng)及時(shí)與我們聯(lián)系,我們將第一時(shí)間處理,。

快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表